Why are the Hybrid hash and base-layer hash different?
3 min readThey identify different records. A Hybrid identifier locates the platform’s retained evidence; a base-layer hash refers to an external-chain transaction when one is published. The two should not be substituted for each other.
One journey can leave several records
Hybrid-Chain can retain evidence about a workflow while an external blockchain records its own transaction. Each system identifies its own record. The Hybrid reference helps locate the platform’s evidence; the base-layer reference identifies the transaction on the relevant external chain. Different values are therefore expected and are not, by themselves, evidence of a mismatch. The useful check is whether the published relationship between the records corresponds to the operation you intended.
Use the matching explorer
Open the Hybrid reference in Hybrid-Chain Explorer. Where a supported base-layer link is present, use the external chain explorer link for the underlying transaction. Compare its chain, asset details, destination, and execution status as appropriate. Do not replace the external reference with the internal one in a report simply to make the fields look consistent. Keeping the labels distinct helps both users and support teams avoid searching the wrong system.
Do not assume a one-to-one relationship
The relationship between business records, platform events, and external transactions depends on the workflow. Several recorded stages can relate to one external event, and an internal operation may not have an external transaction at all. Use the references actually supplied rather than inventing a mapping from similar timestamps or amounts. If an expected link is absent, describe it as missing evidence and investigate through the responsible account or provider workflow before concluding that the transfer succeeded or failed.
What to do next
Use the internal record link for Hybrid evidence and the external explorer link for the base-layer transaction.