Native MPC Wallets
Separate wallet authorization from any one signing service.
A customer can see a deposit on a chain before your platform can safely credit it. Your operations team needs to explain that gap—and later show how a withdrawal was authorized and released. Treating all of these events as a single payment status makes exceptions harder to resolve.
Associate the external observation with its network, asset, funding route, and customer context. Preserve the distinction between detection and the confirmation requirements for credit.
Apply the enabled ownership, reserve, and issuance controls. Record the balance decision against the original observation so treasury can explain pending and rejected credits.
For an activated redemption route, follow the required burn, customer authorization, threshold signing, external release, and finality records. A successful read or burn does not by itself prove release.
An illustrative exchange support case: a customer provides an external transaction reference, but the application balance has not changed.
Support can explain the current stage and the unresolved requirement; treasury can review the same funding trail rather than relying on a screenshot.
Separate wallet authorization from any one signing service.
Connect external funding observations to a controlled settlement workflow.
Keep counterparty checks and transfer decisions in one reviewable flow.
Confirm the network, asset, funding and redemption routes, current MPC activation, and customer authorization model. The published wallet posture is staged; architecture documentation does not establish that signing or value movement is enabled. Review custody, legal, and operational responsibilities for the actual deployment.
Confirm the deployment model, support responsibilities, and commercial terms with the team. This workflow is not a service-level commitment or evidence of production activation.
A read-only evaluation can examine documented portfolio and network-discovery operations. Agree access and scope first; do not infer deposit or withdrawal activation from a successful read.
Map counterparty and policy requirements to the proposed route. Include Transfer Compliance when that workflow is supported and needed; it does not replace legal assessment or signing authorization.