Trust Center & Identity

Digital identity & credentials.
Check the claim behind the relationship.

Help onboarding and review teams assess a credential’s issuer, approval history, and current status. Keep protected case documents separate from the information a verifier is allowed to inspect.

See how it works ↓Discuss your deployment

Scoped access · Check the exact operation and deployment.

Permitted proofCan I check the claim, not the file?
  1. Protected case
  2. Issued credential
  3. Status review
Illustrative workflow · availability and access controls apply
A familiar challenge

A partner needs to verify a claim. You do not want to send the underlying identity documents around to every reviewer.

A more useful way forward

Keep protected case material separate from the issuer, scope, and current status that a verifier may inspect.

See a practical example ↓
Why it matters

Make credential review a current decision.

For identity teams, platform operators, and verifiers.

Put the issuer in context

A credential should explain who issued it and what that issuer was authorized to attest.

Treat trust as a lifecycle

Rotation and revocation matter as much as the original issuance. Review the claim’s current state.

Separate proof from private files

Keep protected subject information behind its access boundary while making permitted verification evidence available.

Core capabilities

The capabilities behind the outcome.

Match these capabilities to your workflow. Enabled operations and access are confirmed during integration planning.

  • Protected case review

    Organize evidence and approval requirements within the permitted access scope.

  • Credential issuance

    Bind an approved claim to its issuer, subject reference, and scope.

  • Rotation and revocation

    Review changes to the credential rather than relying on the original approval alone.

  • Public-safe verification

    Inspect permitted status and proof without publishing the underlying identity documents.

Inspect public records Review documented operations

Public records illustrate inspectable data; they are not customer results or confirmation of production activation.

How Trust Center & Identity works

A credential is more than its original approval.

  1. 01
    Build the case

    Gather the necessary evidence and issuer context under the applicable access and approval policy.

  2. 02
    Issue under authority

    Apply the configured review requirements and bind the resulting claim to its issuer and scope.

  3. 03
    Verify current status

    Check the permitted proof and lifecycle history, including any rotation or revocation relevant to your decision.

A practical example · illustrative

A platform reviews a counterparty credential.

The reviewer needs to know whether a claim is current without publishing the underlying identity documents.

Identify
Resolve the issuer, subject reference, and scope of the claim.
Check
Review current status and the permitted verification history.
Decide
Apply the platform’s own acceptance policy to the verified information.
What the team takes away

A more informed trust decision without treating a credential as universal approval.

Scoped access

Plan your first deployment.

Confirm supported credential types, issuer authority, review workflows, and access policy. A verifiable claim can still be unsuitable for your use case; the receiving organization owns its acceptance decision.

Before your first integration

  • Choose the credential type, issuer, and receiving organization.
  • Define acceptance rules and exactly which fields may be disclosed.
  • Test current, revoked, and insufficient-scope credentials.
Review the integration Check the API contract
Open workspace
Questions before you build

Trust Center & Identity, explained.

Are private identity documents published?

The intended boundary separates protected case material from public-safe commitments and verification state. Confirm exactly which fields your deployment discloses.

Does verification mean I must accept the credential?

No. Verification concerns the claim and its status. You still need to assess the issuer, scope, evidence, and your own acceptance requirements.

What should we agree before starting a pilot?

Use the product-specific checklist above to define scope and acceptance tests. Ask the team to confirm the deployment environment, access, supported operations, integration responsibilities, support arrangements, and commercial terms. Availability labels are not a pricing quote or a service-level commitment.

Explore the technical architecture and walkthroughs

Optional deeper reading. Demonstrations are illustrative, not live operational status or a promise of activation. Use the availability guidance above and the current API contract for integration decisions.

CONSENT BOUNDEVIDENCE PROTECTEDFOUR-EYES APPROVEDPRESENTATION SELECTIVELIFECYCLE CURRENT

TRUST IN ACTION

Follow a credential
through its whole life.

Move through issuance, approval, presentation, rotation, and revocation. Select which claims this illustrative verifier actually receives.

ILLUSTRATIVE FORMAL CREDENTIAL
PRIVATE SUBJECT · PUBLIC-SAFE PROOF
01 · CREDENTIAL_ISSUE

Issue with an explicit authority boundary.

Formal claims are bound to an issuer, subject commitment, evidence policy, validity window, and exact claim schema.

SELECT CLAIMS FOR THIS VERIFIER
NO LEGAL NAME · DOCUMENT IMAGE · ADDRESS · DATE OF BIRTH EXPOSED1 / 5

SIX ACCOUNTABLE BOUNDARIES

Trust is a workflow.
Not a database field.

Each boundary has a distinct authority, privacy surface, and evidence output. No single provider response silently becomes permanent public truth.

01SUBJECT CONSENT

Bind the purpose, requesting organization, permitted evidence, validity window, and disclosure boundary before collection.

02PRIVATE EVIDENCE

Keep documents, provider results, case notes, and sensitive attributes inside the protected review context.

03ISSUER AUTHORITY

Identify the organization, key, policy, and delegated role authorized to create each formal claim.

04INDEPENDENT APPROVAL

Require separate reviewer authority for sensitive issuance, rotation, revocation, and exception decisions.

05SELECTIVE PRESENTATION

Answer one verifier challenge with the minimum required claims instead of exporting a complete identity profile.

06CREDENTIAL LIFECYCLE

Preserve issuance, predecessor, rotation, expiry, suspension, revocation, and current verification state.

ROTATION WITHOUT AMNESIA

Credentials change.
The record should explain why.

Renewal, corrected evidence, policy migration, key rotation, suspension, and revocation create new lifecycle events. Historical claims remain verifiable in their original context while current reliance resolves against the latest admitted state.

Inspect credential lineage

BUSINESS APPLICATIONS

One trust architecture.
Many formal relationships.

Issue, rotate, revoke, and verify formal digital claims. Build the complete identity journey, issue narrow formal claims, or let existing systems consume current verification state through APIs.

01CUSTOMER IDENTITY

Build reusable onboarding evidence that can support accounts, wallets, payments, commerce, and regulated products.

02COUNTERPARTY TRUST

Verify organizational authority, beneficial ownership, accreditation, sanctions context, and operating status.

03WORKFORCE & ACCESS

Issue role, training, clearance, device, and delegated-authority claims with explicit expiry and revocation.

04ASSET ELIGIBILITY

Prove investor, purchaser, holder, residency, or transfer-policy requirements without publishing the underlying identity.

05SUPPLY-CHAIN ASSURANCE

Bind certifications, inspections, operator authority, and facility status to equipment, shipments, or operational records.

06PUBLIC-SECTOR CREDENTIALS

Create formal claims whose issuing authority, validity, lifecycle, and verification can survive organizational boundaries.

TRUST AS A PLATFORM INPUT

A verified claim should
change what the system permits.

Credentials become useful when wallets, transfers, assets, data, and automation can consume their current state without inheriting private identity records.

01TRANSFER COMPLIANCE

Reference verified originator, beneficiary, counterparty, and exception claims without copying private case data.

02NATIVE MPC WALLETS

Bind credentials to first-class Hybrid wallet authority and use them as transaction-policy inputs.

03DIGITAL ASSETS

Gate issuance, holding, transfer, or marketplace participation using current formal claims.

04DATA VAULT

Keep evidence packages protected while publishing only integrity commitments and authorized claim outcomes.

HONEST OPERATING BOUNDARY

Proof supports judgment.
It does not replace it.

A valid credential proves the recorded issuer, policy, lifecycle, and claim outcome. Operators remain responsible for evidence quality, legal basis, provider due diligence, review policy, jurisdiction, retention, and deciding whether a claim is sufficient for a particular use.

LIVEFORMAL CLAIMS & LIFECYCLE

Issue, rotate, revoke, and publicly verify canonical claim commitments and current state.

LIVEPROTECTED REVIEW WORKFLOWS

Separate subject evidence, provider context, reviewer operations, and public-safe proof.

POLICYRELIANCE & REGULATORY EFFECT

Must be defined by the relying organization, relevant law, claim purpose, and operating jurisdiction.

Start with one useful result

Make it work for your team.

Bring your workflow. We’ll help identify the scope, access, and acceptance checks for a practical pilot.

Discuss your deployment
Build the next part of your workflow

Connected products.

Start with Trust Center & Identity. Review these adjacent capabilities when your requirements call for them.

Plan your integration Discuss a scoped pilot All products